Clinton Email Revelation: Destroying Syria “Best Way to Help Israel”
by Stephen Lendman
’s important article on Clinton’s emails as secretary of state revealed raping Libya and killing Gaddafi had nothing to do with ousting a dictator. The official story is always cover for a diabolical hidden agenda.
Her emails provide a window into her soul, revealing a ruthless she-devil, too wicked to entrust with the power of the nation’s highest office, or any other public position.
Her orchestrated naked aggression on Libya had everything to do with “money, banking and preventing African economic sovereignty,” Brown explained.
More was involved, discussed in my own articles in October 2011
and February 2016
(drawing on the earlier one), including replacing the Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya (a “state of masses,” sharing the nation’s oil wealth with the people by providing extraordinary social benefits) with Western controlled tyranny.
Brown’s article is important reading, providing more insight into arguably the most unacceptably dangerous presidential aspirant in US history – likely to succeed Obama, given bipartisan efforts to undermine Trump by any means necessary.
As secretary of state, Clinton also orchestrated war on Syria, nothing civil about it, one of the many Big Lies about the conflict – naked US aggression by any standard, using ISIS and other terrorist fighters (imported mercenaries from scores of countries) as imperial foot soldiers.
WikiLeaks disclosed emails revealed she said “(t)he best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad.”
She called the “strategic relationship” between both countries a threat to Israeli security. Ousting Assad would end “this dangerous alliance.”
It would provide “a massive boon to Israel’s security (and) ease (its) understandable fear of losing its (regional) nuclear monopoly.”
She referred to Iran’s “atom bomb,” knowing its nuclear program was and remains entirely peaceful, with no military component.
“With Assad gone,” she said, “and Iran no longer able to threaten Israel through its proxies, it is possible that the United States and Israel can agree on red lines for when Iran’s program has crossed an unacceptable threshold.”
Naked aggression was her strategy of choice. She called raping Syria, massacring its people and ousting Assad “the right thing” to do.
“Washington should start by expressing its willingness to work with regional allies like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar to organize, train and arm Syrian rebel forces.”
“The fall of the House of Assad could well ignite a sectarian war between the Shiites and the majority Sunnis of the region drawing in Iran, which, in the view of Israeli commanders would not be a bad thing for Israel and its Western allies.”
“(S)enior Israeli intelligence analysts believe that this turn of events may even prove to be a factor in the eventual fall of the current government of Iran.”
She believed threatening Assad and his family with violent overthrow and death was effective strategy, repeating the scenario leading to Gaddafi’s ouster and sodomized murder.
“We came. We saw. He died” in response to his death remains a testimony to her ruthless imperial arrogance, a threat to world peace and security.
Her plotting and influence as secretary of state reveals pure evil. Imagine the threat with her as president, her finger on the nuclear trigger.
She miscalculated believing Russia wouldn’t intervene in Syria. Her entire scheme proved misguided.
It won’t discourage her likely agenda as president, ruthlessly seeking world dominance, perhaps global war with nuclear weapons her strategy of choice.
His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.