Cheerleading SCOTUS Affirmation of Election Fraud
Time and again, the NYT stands with power and privilege over a nation fit to live in and the rule of law.
In its latest edition, the self-styled newspaper of record applauded Friday’s SCOTUS ruling — upholding brazen election fraud over an open, free and fair process.
Its editors led the way, saying: “The Supreme Court thwarts the latest Trumpist attack on American democracy (sic).”
Along with pretending that totalitarian/police state USA is democratic, customary Times litany of bald-faced Big Lies followed.
As explained in a same-day article, SCOTUS on Friday declined to hear arguments of brazen Trump v. Biden/Harris election fraud — despite indisputable hard evidence proving it.
Times editors: The legitimate Texas et al v. Pennsylvania et al lawsuit “would be laughable (sic) were it not so dangerous.”
This inversion of reality and what follows below is polar opposite journalism the way it’s supposed to be — long ago prohibited by Times management and editors.
The same holds for other establishment media — a collective lying machine engaging in daily mass deception over truth-telling and full disclosure at all times.
Times editors: The Texas lawsuit “is the rough equivalent of objecting on the grounds that the other side is winning (sic). “
Indisputable cold, hard facts revealed otherwise. Times editors, columnists, and correspondents don’t even lie well.
Their rubbish fails the smell test.
Times editors: “The Supreme Court was right to toss out the lawsuit (sic).”
When sworn into office, US judicial officers “do solemnly swear (or affirm) that (they) will support and defend the Constitution of the United States” in the discharge of their duties.
They also “solemnly swear or affirm that (they’ll) administer justice (for everyone fairly), according to…the constitution and laws of the United States.”
Time and again, they fail the test, perhaps never more egregiously than for failing to hear Texas v. Pennsylvania arguments.
Its inaction upheld a stolen election instead of reversing it, breaching the rule of law, an impeachable offense.
Times editors: “The health of a democracy (sic) rests on public confidence that elections are free and fair (sic).”
Governance of, by, and for everyone equitably — according to the rule of law — is pure fantasy in the US, the West overall, and most other nations.
The same goes for elections that time and again are selections, not the real thing.
Times editors: “Republicans are establishing a new standard for elections that anything short of a fight to the death amounts to not trying hard enough (sic).”
Elections the way they’re supposed to be aren’t a Republican or Dem issue.
They’re all about whether elections when held reflect the popular will or undermines it.
The latter applies to Trump v. Biden/Harris 2020, not the former.
What Times editors called “election denialism” reflects their support for brazen fraud over democracy — the real thing, not its fantasy version which is none at all.
Reinventing reality, Times editors audaciously claimed that “events of recent weeks demonstrated the strength and resilience of the (US) election system (sic).”
Perhaps officials of Stalinist Russia and Adoph’s Germany are fist-pumping approval of the above deception from the hereafter.
Despite all-out efforts by the Times and other establishment media to reinvent Election 2020 results, Biden and Harris are president and vice present-select, not the other way around.
The will of the people was overruled by a higher authority to install their team in office over the alternative.
As for ordinary Americans, they lose whenever US selections are held.
Governance of, by, and for privileged interests exclusively at their expense always prevails.
It’s the American way — mass media supported fantasy democracy, the real thing banned.
My two Wall Street books are timely reading:
“How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion, and Class War”
“Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity”