Mass-Jabbing Madness

Mass-Jabbing Madness

by Stephen Lendman ( – Home – Stephen Lendman)

Since early last year, countless millions in the West and elsewhere have endured the grand-daddy of all public health scams in human history.

Seasonal flu now called covid doesn’t remotely warrant multiple jabs with hazardous experimental drugs that risk contracting the illness they’re supposed to prevent.

Worse still, toxins in these drugs risk contraction of major autoimmune and/or other diseases near-or-longer-term.

Avoiding them is crucial to protect and preserve health that if lost may not be regained.

On Thursday, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) disturbingly sided with Western dark forces and Pharma by flagrantly breaching the Nuremberg Code.

It requires voluntary consent on matters relating to health.

It prohibits what risks harm to health or death.

Defying the above core principles, the court ruled for requiring young children to be jabbed for multiple diseases that won’t protect and risks possible irreversible harm.

According to legal expert Nicolas Hervieu, compulsory mass-jabbing likely applies to seasonal flu now called covid, adding:

The court’s ruling “reinforces the possibility of a compulsory vaccination under” current conditions.

The ECHR ruled that unjabbed children prevented from attending school is in their “best interests” — ignoring that keeping them out is flagrantly discriminatory, providing no health protection for them, their classmates or teachers.

Defying reality and the rule of law, the court called unlawful/unacceptable measures “necessary in a democratic society (sic),” adding:

“The objective has to be that every child is protected against serious diseases, through vaccination or by virtue of herd immunity (sic).”

According to science, polar opposite is true. 

Mandatory jabs with toxins that don’t protect and risk serious harm constitute a flagrant breach of international law.

International human rights laws mandate the right to health.

They prohibit non-consensual medical treatments — that applies to use of experimental drugs, or any that risk serious harm.

The right to health includes “equality of opportunity for everyone to enjoy (its) highest attainable level” — free from unacceptable coercion.

The ECHR ruling is polar opposite protection of children and others “against serious diseases.”

The court’s Thursday ruling was its first on mass-jabbing.

While not directly dealing with covid jabs, it may be used by European states to mandate them ahead.

Sixteen of 17 judges rejected the notion that compulsory jabbing violates respect for sovereignty over our bodies.

Mass-jabbing for diseases increases their outbreaks, not the other way around.

The court’s ruling supports proliferation of diseases, not protection against them.

VISIT MY WEBSITE: (Home – Stephen Lendman). Contact at

My two Wall Street books are timely reading:

“How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion, and Class War”


“Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: