Covid Mass-Jabbing Medical Bioterrorism

Covid Mass-Jabbing Medical Bioterrorism

by Stephen Lendman (stephenlendman.org – Home – Stephen Lendman)

Eminent Professor of Medicine Dr. Peter McCullough called covid jabs “a bioweapon intended to mark and kill you.”

He’s not alone. Many other truth-telling medical and scientific experts made similar comments, including Dr. Vernon Coleman.

Author of over 100 books on health and medicine, he called covid a politicized hoax, seasonal flu rebranded, in March last year.

On June 19, he asked: “How many people are (covid jabs) killing?”

Official US, UK and EU-published data are shocking enough but woefully understated.

They “only (represent about) 1% of…adverse events” from covid mass-jabbing, he stressed, adding:

Get jabbed and risk potentially deadly blot clots, “strokes, heart attacks, miscarriages, Bell’s Palsy, sepsis, paralysis, psychiatric disorders, blindness, deafness, shingles, alopecia and” and the viral  illness they’re supposed to protect against but don’t.

He cited former Pfizer chief scientist for allergy and respiratory illnesses Dr. Michael Yeadon saying covid jabs are 50 times more likely to cause death in children than the viral illness.

Dozens of UK doctors told Boris Johnson regime drug regulators that jabbing children for covid is “irresponsible, unethical and unnecessary.”

They’re “killing and injuring people across the world,” Coleman stressed.

An Israeli people’s committee report of adverse events from covid jabbing said “(n)ever has a vaccine injured so many” — notably so quickly.

Infants breast-fed by covid jabbed mothers were infected with life-threatening toxins.

“(P)ro-vaxxers (claim covid jabs are) perfectly safe and perfectly effective.” 

“Even when they wouldn’t be considered safe enough to use as oven cleaner, the fanatics enthuse about them.” 

“Young people and those who know little about medicine or science, talk about vaccines with reverence because they’ve been indoctrinated into believing the pro-vaccine lies.”

“And the pro-vaxxers are lying, of course.”

According to FDA data suppressed by establishment media, vaccines risk contraction of the following diseases:

Guillain-Barre syndrome

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis

Transverse myelitis

Encephalitis

Myelitis

Encephalomyelitis

Meningoencephalitis

Meningitis

Encephalopathy

Convulsions

Seizures

Stroke

Narcolepsy

Cataplexy

Anaphylaxis

Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack)

Myocarditis

Pericarditis

Autoimmune diseases

Death

Stillbirths

Other acute demyelinating diseases

Non-anaphylactic allergy reactions

Thromocytopenia

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

Venous thromboembolism

Arthritis

Arthralgia

Joint pain

Kawasaki disease

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children

Vaccine enhanced disease

All of the above are “unpleasant,” Coleman explained, “most (risking) death.”

Everyone “mad enough” to be covid jabbed should stay alert to symptoms of the above diseases by consulting with their doctors.

US, UK, EU, and other European regimes suppressed the danger.

On all things related to covid mass-jabbing, informed consent in the West was banned.

Coleman asked:

“Will the mainstream media ever start recording…deaths or illnesses” from covid jabs? 

“Or are journalists going to continue to promote the official government line – and to deny, distort or suppress the truth?”

“How many people have to die before the media wake up?”

Does the Wall Street Journal have second thoughts on covid mass-jabbing?

Are its editors willing to report accurately on their hazards?

On June 22, the Journal published an op-ed by Yale School of Public Health epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch and UCLA Professor of Medicine Dr. Joseph Ladapo, titled:

“Are Covid Vaccines Riskier Than Advertised?”

I’ve written about Risch before, explaining the following:

According to his analysis, up to 60% or more of flu/covid outbreaks occur in people jabbed for protection against it not gotten.

The US public has been sold false promises, he stressed, adding:

At most, covid jabs may reduce covid symptoms if contract the illness — to what extent depending on age and overall health.

Instead of preventing flu/covid, jabs spread the disease — while not protecting against contracting it.

Last year in an American Journal of Epidemiology (AJE) article, he explained that:

“The key to defeating (covid) already exists” — with no fear-mongering, lockdowns, quarantines, face masks, social distancing, mass-jabbing with experimental drugs, and other draconian policies.

When flu/covid symptoms appear, indicating contraction of the viral illness, it can be cured “easily and quickly,” Risch explained.

It’s by taking hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) within around 10 days after symptoms of illness appear.

When used combined with either azithromycin or doxycycline and zinc, “it has been shown to be (safe and) highly effective” in treating and curing flu/covid.

The same applies to use of ivermectin.

Yet recommending their use publicly risks being demeaned and de-licensed to practice medicine by Pharma-connected medical boards.

In their WSJ piece, Risch and Ladapo said the following:

“Some scientists have raised concerns that the safety risks of (covid jabbing) have been underestimated.” 

“But the politics of vaccination has relegated their concerns to the outskirts of scientific thinking—for now,” adding:

“Historically, the safety of medications — including vaccines — is often not fully understood until they are deployed in large populations.”

“(L)arge clustering” of side effects from covid jabs is “concerning…” 

“(S)ilence around these potential signals of harm reflects the politics surrounding” covid mass-jabbing.

Their adverse events are “certainly (much) higher” than what’s publicly reported, Risch and Ladapo stressed.

“This tendency of underreporting is consistent with our clinical experience.”

US/Western public health agencies conceal what’s vital for everyone to know.

The authors added that “not a single published study has demonstrated that patients with a prior infection benefit from” covid jabs. 

“That this isn’t readily acknowledged by the CDC or Anthony Fauci is an indication of how deeply entangled pandemic politics is in science.”

US/Western public health agencies failed to be “forthcoming about the (risk) of harm” from covid jabs.

“There will be lasting consequences from mingling political partisanship and science…”

WSJ-published remarks by Risch and Lapapo are world’s apart from establishment media complicity with US/Western mass deception about all things covid.

Was the Journal article a sign of more of the same to come?

Or was it a one-off mainstream aberration not to be repeated?

VISIT MY WEBSITE: stephenlendman.org (Home – Stephen Lendman). Contact at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

My two Wall Street books are timely reading:

“How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion, and Class War”

https://www.claritypress.com/product/how-wall-street-fleeces-america/

 

“Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity”

https://www.claritypress.com/product/banker-occupation-waging-financial-war-on-humanity/

streamingclarity.global