Ivermectin Cures Flu/Covid Safely – Why the NYT Opposes its Use

Ivermectin Cures Flu/Covid Safely — Why the NYT Opposes its Use

by Stephen Lendman (stephenlendman.org – Home – Stephen Lendman)

In cahoots with US/Western dark forces and Pharma profiteers, the NYT supports hazardous to health flu/covid jabs and related practices that facilitate draconian social control and depopulation.

It opposes known safe and effective protocols for treating flu/covid. See below.

Ivermectin is one of a number of safe and effective flu/covid treatments.

They’re free from heavily promoted jabs designed to irreparably harm health.

It’s why the Times supports them while opposing safe and effective protocols.

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) minced no words saying:

Ivermectin “obliterates (covid) transmission. (It) prevents the (need for) hospitalization.”

The same is true for “hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), zinc, and zithromax.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko safely and effectively cured flu/covid patients with corcidin, vitamin C, D, and zinc.

He pioneered use of safe, effective, low-cost hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), azithromycin and zinc sulfate — successfully treating and curing over 3,000 flu/covid ill patients with this protocol. 

Dr. Pierre Kory called ivermectin safe and effective, stressing:

“If you take it, you will not get sick. (It’s) “miraculous.”

“(W)hen I say ‘miracle,’ I do not use that term lightly.”

Ivermectin “obliterates (covid) transmission.”

“I’m a lung specialist…an ICU specialist.”

“Early treatment is key. We need to offload the hospitals.”

When used as directed, ivermectin “prevents the (need for) hospitalization.”

Separately he said “(t)he data (are) unassailable…Ivermectin save(s) lives.”

Other distinguished doctors endorsing the above protocols over toxic jabs include professor of medicine, practicing physician, public health expert Peter McCullough MD, epidemiologist Harvey Risch MD/PhD, virologist George Fareed MD, AFLDS physicians, and many others.

Britain’s Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy director Tess Lawrie MD said the following:

After “independently review(ing) 27 studies (on) ivermectin(’s) effectiveness” in treating and curing flu/covid, she found “consistent and   unequivocal” evidence that it prevents and effectively treats the viral illness, adding:

“Ivermectin should be adopted globally and systematically for the prevention and treatment of” flu/covid.

“Because I know there is a lot of fake news going about, I would like to assure you that you can trust the integrity of my report because I am an experienced independent medical research consultant whose work is routinely used to underpin international clinical practice guidelines.”

“I have no conflict of interest and have received no funding for this report.” 

By letter to UK PM Boris Johnson, she said:

“(Y)ou can trust me because I am a medical doctor first and foremost with a moral duty to help people, to do no harm and to save lives.”

She got no reply to her recommended treatment protocol from the Johnson regime.

Last April at an International Ivermectin for (Flu/Covid) conference, she said the following — published by mercola.com:

“The story of ivermectin has highlighted that we are at a remarkable juncture in medical history.” 

“The tools that we use to heal and our connection with our patients are being systematically undermined by relentless disinformation stemming from corporate greed.”

“The story of ivermectin shows that we as a public have misplaced our trust in the authorities and have underestimated the extent to which money and power corrupts.”

“Had ivermectin being employed in 2020 when medical colleagues around the world first alerted the authorities to its efficacy, (all things flu/covid could have been) brought to a rapid and timely end.”

“With politicians and other nonmedical individuals dictating to us what we are allowed to prescribe for the ill, we as doctors, have been put in a position such that our ability to uphold the Hippocratic oath is under attack.”

“At this fateful juncture, we must therefore choose.”

“Will we continue to be held ransom by corrupt organizations, health authorities, Big Pharma, and billionaire sociopaths, or will we do our moral and professional duty to do no harm and always do the best for those in our care?”

“The latter includes urgently reaching out to colleagues around the world to discuss which of our tried and tested safe older medicines can be used against” flu/covid.

Like his US, French, German and other European counterparts, Boris Johnson supports draconian social control and depopulation by mass-jabbing Brits with toxic flu/covid drugs.

Virologist Marc Wathelet MD said the following:

“The selective pressure of the antibodies (from jabbing)) will select viruses that are able to escape the antibodies.”

“(T)hat’s a danger. (W)e already see that happening with the different mutants.” 

“(A) great advantage of ivermectin over (jabbing) is (that) the virus cannot evolve resistance to it.”

He recommends ivermectin for everyone infected with flu/covid and others in close contact with an infected person, stressing:

This protocol can prevent outbreaks and cure invected individuals. 

Peter McCullough MD and George Freed MD said HCQ and ivermectin complement each other.

In June, Joseph Mercola stressed that ivermectin can save lives, but doctors in the West and elsewhere “were told not to use it.”

Yet studies show that the drug safely and effectively “inhibits” the viral infection…protects against organ damage, prevents transmission (to others), speeds recovery, and lowers risk of hospitalization and death in (flu/covid) patients.”

Over the weekend, the NYT cited the Pharma-connected FDA fake news warning — advising against use of safe and effective ivermectin, pushing health-destroying jabs instead.

Earlier, the Pharma-connected NIH falsely claimed that studies of ivermectin’s use “had incomplete information and significant methodological limitations” — a bald-faced Big Lie in support of toxic mass-jabbing.

There’s nothing “controversial” about ivermectin’s use in treating flu/covid as the Times falsely claimed.

Ignoring its safety and effectiveness, it falsely said that “recent studies found that the drug’s efficacy (in treating flu/covid) is thin (sic).”

No such studies exist — except perhaps dubious ones by Pharma or conducted under its auspices. 

The Times quoted the FDA, saying:

“Taking large doses of this drug is dangerous and can cause serious harm.”

The same applies to all drugs, why they should only be used as directed.

Since seasonal flu underwent a name change early last year, virtually everything recommended by US/Western regimes, their public health handmaidens and press agent media like the Times has been all about harming health, not protecting and preserving it as sound medical practice dictates.

VISIT MY WEBSITE: stephenlendman.org (Home – Stephen Lendman). Contact at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

My two Wall Street books are timely reading:

“How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion, and Class War”



“Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity”




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: