An article by Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD (in computational biology), MSc (in immunology), and BSc (in applied mathematics) and Peter McCullough MD for the Current Problems in Cardiology journal was pulled from publication to suppress its findings.
Based on an analysis of CDC reported VAERS data, they explained the following:
Within 8 weeks of jabbing 12 to 15-year-olds for protection against flu/covid not gotten, the number experiencing myocarditis is 19 times greater than what’s expected.
The serious issue is inflammation of the heart muscle (myocardium). It can reduce the heart’s ability to pump and causes rapid or abnormal heart rhythms (arrhythmias).
It can be caused by an adverse drug reaction like from toxic flu/covid jabs.
There’s also a 5-fold increase from a second jab to the same age group, compounding damage from the first shot administered.
Of the number of myocarditis cases found by the authors, six died, one aged-13.
Rose and McCullough showed that the issue following jabs is far from rare.
They learned that reported numbers of myocarditis following jabs reflect “the tip of the iceberg.”
The true toll is likely a 100 times or more greater.
The incidence of myocarditis is likely similar for other age groups. It’s one of any number of serious issues that can happen from jabs.
Rose and McCullough stressed that it’s “reasonable to use the precautionary principle in this particular setting since an alarming number of reports are coming from young males between the ages of 12 and 15.”
“Boys of these ages should be carefully monitored for warning signs of myocarditis which many may pass off such as pallor, chest pain, shortness of breath or lethargy, following dose 1 with the aim of seeking prompt evaluation and avoiding dose 2.”
Instead of publishing this data as prepared for Current Problems in Cardiology, the publication suppressed what its editors don’t want readers to know that may interfere with toxic mass-jabbing — what’s crucial for everyone to know.
There’s nothing ethical, moral or legal about what’s going on — just the opposite.
As Rose and McCullough prepared their findings for publication, they received the following message:
“The publisher regrets that this article has been temporarily removed (sic).”
“A replacement will appear as soon as possible in which the reason for the removal of the article will be specified, or the article will be reinstated (sic).
In response to what happened, inventor of mRNA and RNA technology Dr. Robert Malone said the following:
“More Censorship/Cancel Culture. (Rose and McCullough) were notified of this ‘Temporary Removal’ action.”
“I have never seen anything like this ever in my entire scientific career.”
It’s “not the first time that a journal article questioning the mainstream narrative of “safe and effective (flu/covid jabs was) retracted without explanation.”
What’s going on is clear. Truth and full disclosure on this most crucial issue of all-time is banned in the mainstream that exclusively features the fabricated official narrative.
Even organizations like the AMA and scientific journals like Current Problems in Cardiology were corrupted to go along what what’s responsible for harming countless millions of people worldwide — killing hundreds of thousands.