MSM War on Russia Continues in the New Year

Operating as press agents for hegemon USA’s power elite, including its monied interests — at the expense of peace and governance serving all Americans equitably — MSM bashing of Washington’s invented enemies continues in the new year.

With no end of it in prospect, it’s at the expense of journalism as it should be.

MSM’s modus operandi long ago abandoned it in favor of serving US dark forces and monied interests exclusively.

The NYT operates as a virtual US ministry of propaganda, fake news its stock and trade on major domestic and geopolitical issues — truth-telling long ago banned in its daily editions.

Ahead of Russian security talks with the US, NATO and OSCE next week, the self-styled newspaper of record again defied reality by the following fake news, saying:

“A build-up of Russian forces near the border with Ukraine raised concerns among Western and Ukrainian officials that the Kremlin might be preparing for significant military action, possibly an invasion (sic).”

Fact: No Russian forces are built up against Ukraine or any other nations.

Once again, the Times lied, falsely claiming otherwise.

It knows that no Russian threat exists against any nations.

It knows that hegemon USA poses an unparalleled threat to everyone everywhere — including against its own people. 

No “Russian architecture (was) construct(ed) for a significant military intervention in Ukraine.”

Claiming otherwise by the Times is a bald-based Big Lie like countless others — what it and other MSM are infamous for.

The Times quoted US-installed NATO puppet Stoltenberg’s Big Lie — falsely claiming that “the risk of (Russian) conflict is real,” knowing nothing of the kind exists.

Fake news about a nonexistent Russian threat to Ukraine diverts attention from effectively countering made-in-the-USA violence in Kazakhstan — by peacekeepers from Russia and other allied regional countries.

Separately, the Times falsely claimed that Vladimir Putin aims to regain Russian control over Ukraine — despite no evidence suggesting it.

A further litany of bald-faced Big Lies about Russia’s leader followed — made-up stuff not rising to the level of bad fiction.

WaPo editors bashed Russia (and other OSCE countries) for intervening against made-in-the-USA violence in Kazakhstan.

They called for Biden regime hardliners and NATO vassal states to lead a “strong and unified Western response” against Moscow at next week’s security talks.

According to WSJ fake news, “the world wonders if Vladimir Putin is about to seize more territory (sic) from a former Soviet republic (sic),” adding:

“At the same time, Mr. Putin has stepped up repression inside Russia’s borders (sic).

The Journal knows that the above is fake news but reported it anyway, adding:

“What will (the) Biden (regime) give Putin to avoid an invasion of Ukraine (sic)?”

“The crisis created by Russia (sic) at Ukraine’s border is the most dangerous moment for Eastern Europe in decades (sic).”

Journal hyperventilating aside, crisis conditions most everywhere were made and/or supported by hegemon USA in pursuing its diabolical aims.

According to National Pentagon Radio (NPR) fake news, Russia/Western security talks next week aim “to fend off a new (sic) invasion of Ukraine (sic).”

Despite no Russian threat to any nations, the London Guardian invented a nonexistent one.

Citing head of Britain’s armed forces, Tony Radakin, the Guardian “warned that Russian submarine activity is threatening underwater cables that are crucial to communication systems around the world (sic).”

Radakin and the Guardian know no such threat exists.

On deployment of Russian and other CSTO peacekeepers to quell made-in-the-USA violence in Kazakhstan, UK owned, controlled and proliferated BBC propaganda cited Blinken’s Big Lies, saying the following:

“(O)ne lesson of recent history is that once Russians are in your house, it’s sometimes very difficult to get them to leave (sic).”

“Kazakh authorities…have the capacity to deal appropriately with protests to do so in a way that respects the rights of protesters (sic) while maintaining law and order (sic).”

“So it’s not clear why they feel the need for any outside assistance (sic).” 

“So we’re trying to learn more about it (sic).”

There’s no ambiguity about hegemon USA’s aims in Kazakhstan — or about Russian-led CSTO peacekeepers to counter them swiftly and effectively.

Are dominant Biden regime hardliners pushing for greater war on multiple fronts in the new year?

Do they have global war in mind?

Will they destroy planet earth by their megalomaniacal rage to own it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: