Pro-Ivermectin Legislation

There’s no ambiguity about ivermectin.

It’s been approved for human use in the US since the mid-1990s.

Despite the fabricated official narrative otherwise, it’s remarkably safe and effective in treating and curing flu/covid.

When taken as directed, ivermectin obliterates the illness.

It can be used prophylactically or taken if contract flu/covid. 

It protects against organ damage, prevents flu/covid transmission, minimizes risk of hospitalizations, largely eliminates deaths, and hastens full recovery swiftly.

Medical providers who use ivermectin consider it a virtual wonder drug because of its safety and effectiveness.

Peer-reviewed studies proved it.

If widely prescribed by physicians throughout the US/West and elsewhere, it would put an end to mass-jabbing with experimental, hazardous, rushed-to-market kill shots.

Pharma would lose a bonanza of profits. Flu/covid casualties would largely disappear.

The made-in-the-USA scheme to destroy public health and what remains of greatly eroded freedoms would be defeated.

That’s why ivermectin and other known safe and effective protocols for treating flu/covid aren’t readily available.

Few US/Western doctors prescribe them. Hospitals largely ban their use.

What Pharma wants, it gets. The same goes for US/Western dark forces.

They want nothing interfering with their war on humanity by health-destroying kill shots and all else flue/covid.

MSM were enlisted to discredit and otherwise stigmatize safe and effective ways to treat and cure the illness.

They want nothing made widely available that can halt forever mass-jabbing humanity with what’s designed to harm health, not preserve and protect it.

They want state-approved fiction alone reported on all things flu/covid, especially about toxic jabs crucial to shun.

Their mendacity and contempt for truth and full disclosure is on display for everyone to see and know.

They’re enemies of ordinary people and virtually everything just societies hold dear.

They’re beholden exclusively to wealth and power interests at the expense of public health, fundamental freedoms, the rule of law and journalism as it should be.

Last fall, Nebraska AG Doug Peterson, Assistant AG Mindy Lester and Solicitor General James Campbell jointly said the following:

“(W)e find that the available data (do) not justify filing disciplinary actions against physicians simply because they prescribe ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine to prevent or treat” flu/covid.

“Based on these principles, we conclude that governing law allows physicians to use FDA-approved medicines that are unproven for a particular off-label use so long as: 

(1) reasonable medical evidence supports that use and 

(2) a patient’s written informed consent is obtained.”

“In the context of this ever-changing global pandemic (of the jabbed alone), we note that it is appropriate to consider medical evidence outside of Nebraska and to give physicians who obtain informed consent an added measure of deference on their assessment of the available medical evidence.”

Legislation was introduced in Indiana, Kansas, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire to make the drug widely available. More on this below.

Eminent physician/bioterrorism expert Meryl Nass MD had her license to treat patients as medicine should be practiced suspended for treating flu/covid patients with known safe and effective protocols — notably ivermectin hydroxychloroquine (HCQ).

She was ordered to undergo a neuropsychological evaluation for practicing medicine the right way.

Noted critical care physician Paul Marik MD was mistreated in similar fashion for wanting flu/covid patients treated with known safe and effective protocols.

Denouncing “corporations and faceless bureaucrats (for) interfer(ing) with doctor-patient decisions, (he) refus(ed) to watch another patient die from” flu/covid by being denied the right to treat them safely and effectively.

Nass explained that “(i)vermectin not only works during viral replication, but also is effective later in the illness,” adding:

“(D)ozens of independent studies (proved) the drug’s safety and effectiveness.”

Yet doctors like Nass, Marik and others who prescribe the drug risk suspension or loss of their license to practice medicine.

Reportedly, New Hampshire legislators are on the cusp of making ivermectin available as an over-the-counter medication for state residents wanting it more easily obtainable.

According to state Rep. Leah Cushman:

“I have absolutely no doubt lives will be saved if human grade ivermectin (is made readily) available to (flu/covid) patients.”

Countering Pharma-linked critics of the drug, Marik debunked their fabricated claims.

Explaining that ivermectin is one of the safest drugs available, he explained that it’s approved for human use in scores of countries.

Over 3.7 billion doses of ivermectin has been dispensed as an anti-parasitic drug.

Enacting the measure into law may encourage other states to follow suit.

The website is a reliable source of truth and full disclosure on the drug.

It’s worlds apart from the fabricated official narrative and MSM-proliferated rubbish in support of kill shots and Pharma profiteering.

3 thoughts on “Pro-Ivermectin Legislation

Add yours

  1. Not to brag too much, but I was into Ivermectin before it became cool. I used to give it to my cat because I was too cheap to get that other topical stuff.. forget what you call it. Just a few drops o the back of the neck. Ivermectin had a bit of a cult following even back in the day – irt was a favorite flea control and anti-microbial for people who owned ore worked in ranches, for horses and stuff.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: