The NYT Endorses Kill Shots for Infants and Kids Based on Flawed Data

Like virtually all other MSM across the board, the Times supports maximum harm to maximum numbers of people from kill shots designed for this purpose.

The broadsheet backs destruction of health in all age groups, including infants as young as 6 months old.

Discussing Saturday’s CDC approval of kill shots for kids, the Times once again expressed support for what demands opposition — especially because of flawed data, what’s discussed in a same-day article.

Defying science, the Times falsely claimed that “benefits outweigh risks (sic)” — knowing reality is indisputably the other way around.

The broadsheet quoted Pharma-connected-CDC advisory committee on kill shots member, Dr. Beth Bell’s defiance of science and medicine as it should be practiced, falsely saying the following:

“This is an opportunity that one does not get very often (sic): the prevention of children’s deaths (sic).” 

“We know this disease is killing children (sic).”

Indisputable reality is polar opposite her bald-faced Big Lies — most likely with mass-extermination of unwanteds and more Big Bucks for Pharma profiteers in mind.

Operating as a virtual Pharma press agent, the Times noted the availability of Pfizer and Moderna kill shots for infants and young kids “as soon as Tuesday,” June 21.

The broadsheet defied science by falsely calling their jabs “safe” and effective — ignoring indisputable evidence otherwise.

So-called experts quoted are all likely Pharma-connected.

So naturally they push mass-jabbing instead of warning of its irreparable harm.

The Times quoted bad advice by chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ committee on infectious diseases, Dr. Yvonne Maldonado, saying:

“The sooner you start them off getting protection, the better” — referring to jabbing infants and young kids.

On Friday, Dr. Peter Marks, head of the FDA’s kill shot division, said parents should feel comfortable with either the Pfizer or Moderna experimental/hazardous to health mRNA drug.

Defying science, both the FDA and CDC ignored clear evidence of harmful side effects from their jabs.

And this perversion of reality from FDA commissioner, Dr. Robert Califf, falsely saying:

“As we have seen with older age groups (sic), we expect that (jabs) for younger children will provide protection from the most severe outcomes of (flu/covid), such as hospitalization and death (sic).”

And this from the fake Biden on Saturday:

“Today is a day of huge relief for parents and families across America (sic).”

MSM across the board notoriously feature fake news over journalism as it should be.

They all push kill shots instead of warning against their use.

WaPo cheered the availability of kill shots for infants and young kids, saying:

They’re “finally here.”

Unnamed “doctors say children should get (jabbed) even if they were previously infected” with flu/covid and fully recovered.

According to science, natural immunity antibodies from flu/covid recovery protect best of all against reinfection.

And this defiance of science by Pharma-connected-CDC official Dr. Sara Oliver, falsely saying the following:

“The (flu/covid) pandemic (that doesn’t exist) continues to have a significant impact on families (sic).” 

Flu-renamed covid “can cause severe disease and death among young children, including children without underlying conditions (sic).”

And this rubbish from pediatrician Matthew Daley, falsely claiming:

“(W)e have an opportunity to prevent severe disease and death (sic).”

Parents who permit their kids to be jabbed with health-destroying kill shots are guilty of child abuse.

Parents wanting the health of their kids of all ages protected should shun them.

The same reality applies to everyone in all age groups about jabs designed to irreparably harm health, not protect it as falsely promoted since garden variety flu got a scary new name.

A Final Comment

Founded in 2016, the National Pulse calls itself a source of “real news and investigations,” adding:

“We aren’t funded by billionaires or corporates. We’re a small team of real news reporters” that relies on funding by readers.

On June 16, it reported that “MSM quietly deleted a story revealing that severe (flu/covid) is rarely ever found in the un(jabbed).”

Many unjabbed individuals rely on protection from “natural treatments such as vitamin D, zinc, quercetin, and drugs such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.”

The vast majority of flu/covid outbreaks occur among jabbed individuals — the more jabs gotten, the greater the harm to health.

The same reality applies to hospitalizations and deaths.

Staying unjabbed protects health.

The other way around virtually assures harm sooner or later.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: