Next Likely UK Prime Minister Willing to Wage Nuclear War?

On Wednesday, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, said the following about Britain’s likely BoJo replacement as prime minister:

Current UK foreign minister, Liz Truss at No. 10 “could be a perfect start to a new Austin Powers movie.”

“Now, a female would play the role of the international man of mystery.”

In mid-July, Russia’s UK envoy, Andrey Kelin, said the following about a real life female Darth Vader:

“We saw Truss in action during her visit to Moscow” last February.

“It was a sad sight. It was much talked about.”

“She failed to ‘put in check’ Sergey Lavrov.”

“I don’t think she will be able to do anything at a higher level.” 

“She never listens to any arguments or just turns a deaf ear on them. I have seen that for myself.”

During her meeting with Lavrov, she refused to recognize Russian sovereignty over its Voronezh and Rostov regions.

According to BoJo regime damage control after the fact, she falsely believed that these regions were part of Ukraine.

Last March, Lavrov slammed how Truss turns truth on its head time and again, saying:

She defied reality, “saying that if Putin doesn’t lose in Ukraine, then there will be no limit to his ambitions, and the Baltic states and Moldova will be the next targets (sic).”

“This is Liz Truss, who is (in)famous for her aphorisms.”

Her perversions of reality are “quite exemplary of English culture, politics and (lack of) diplomacy.”

“That’s because the British wrote the fake testament of Peter the Great in exactly the same way.”

Remarks by Truss are “basically along the same lines.”

In early July, Lavrov slammed BoJo and Truss for clearly trying to (find) find pretexts for the Royal Navy to infiltrate the Black Sea” to more greatly destabilize the region than already.

According to YouGov poll results last week, 66% of Tories favor Truss over Rishi Sunak in the race to replace BoJo as prime minister next month.

The poll also showed that if BoJo was contesting to remain at No. 10, he has 46% Tory support compared to 24% for Truss and 23% for Sunak.

He’s not, she is, and as things now stand, she’ll be declared new UK prime minister on September 5.

Brits should tremble at the prospect because of incompetence and  menace she represents — what’s all about ideology, not gender.

On Tuesday, Truss was asked the following during a debate with Sunak:

Use of nukes would risk “global annihilation.”

“I won’t ask you if you would press the button. You’ll say yes, but faced with that task I would feel physically sick.”

“How does that thought make you feel?”

In response, Truss said the following:

“I think it’s an important duty of the prime minister, and I’m ready to do that.”

For emphasis, she repeated: “I’m ready to do that.”

There’s no ambiguity about Truss’ militant hawkishness. Nor about her fanatical Russophobia.

Citing hostile remarks by her and other UK officials months earlier, Kremlin spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said the following:

“Statements were made by various representatives at various levels on possible altercations or even collisions and clashes between Nato and Russia.”

“We believe that such statements are absolutely unacceptable.”

“I would not call the authors of these statements by name, although it was the British foreign minister.”

Virtually the entire UK political establishment and its press agent media are militantly hostile toward Russia.

Besides Truss, other former and current senior UK officials expressed support for use of nukes against Russia — ignoring the risk of potential armageddon.

While use of these weapons by Britain or hegemon USA is by no means likely at this time, the risk remains ominously real.


4 thoughts on “Next Likely UK Prime Minister Willing to Wage Nuclear War?

Add yours

  1. The UK lost her empire due to her launching WW1 and WW2 to eliminate Germany as an economic competitor. Now wanting to eliminate Russia and China. When will she ever learn?

    Jezebel Truss will likely be their next PM but the populace has no say in it all. This is called democracy, western values and rules-based order.

    Jezebel pressing the UK nuclear button will bring one RS-28 Sarmat missile to eliminate Whitehall and the UK via Antarctica.


  2. It’s sad because the British Empire was the largest nasty empire in human history but I think it’s really the City of London at the heart of for want of a better word is evil. Money as they say is the root of all evil and even when the Normans invaded in 1066 they didn’t mess with the “City”. The “empire” the largest pirate empire ruling the seven seas and looting everyone they could? With the City seeing their “empire” ending they came up with the fascinating idea of luring all the wealth of the world into their offshore Tax Havens-which they seem to have done. If you get everyone with money to join in then there will be no-one with power to oppose this. A club of money and power globally while regular England is just another failed state filled with mostly poor folks-long used as cannon fodder in their endless “wars” or for labor. Of course with “lords” mostly wealthy chairman of various corporations and banks headed by the Queen or King of a dubious bloodline they do have a lot of power all presented so politely termed “civilized” by themselves which is ridiculous in reality. This tiny failed state run by the City of London with some Prime Minister as a front like Parliament might actually be the Center of all the evil stuff going on(money laundering) as Roberto Saviano suggested-(Mafia exposer from Naples). I think when you have such concentrations of wealth and money it only can be a bad thing for regular folks everywhere because all they tend to care about is their ROI not life, human welfare, or anything nice. More wealth? More is needed to keep that ROI going up! Markets and investments don’t have any emotion or empathy for others its just simple arithmetic to make profits from anything and everything globally. Opium? You betcha! Afghan heroin? Why not? Weapons sales and subverting foreign nations to steal their resources? Of course! Using capital for the benefit of the regular folks doesn’t enter much of the picture only their usefulness as labor, soldier bots, cannon fodder, while keeping them under tight control and helpless. Humans, labor is an expense on accounting balance sheet not an asset and to be had at the lowest possible cost by “management”. I’m sure Liz was selected to be a “good manager” for them which means hard times for the regular folks for sure. My family escaped over 230 years ago although we had spent time in the 1950’s in Canberra ACT which actually is run out of Washington the military side of the Empire since they wormed back in the USA in 1913. It’s getting to be more like “Brave New World” and “1984” today which is amazing for those writers to have had so much foresight.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: