The WSJ on Bivalent Kill Shots

On Dec. 8, the Pharma-controlled FDA amended emergency use authorizations (EUAs) — when no emergency exists — to include toxic bivalent jabs for young children and infants as young as six months-old.

Left unexplained was that no human testing was conducted, on 8 mice alone.

It’s more damning evidence of how Pharma in collusion with the Biden regime defrauded the public on kill shots and all else flu/covid related.

To its partial credit but not enough to matter, the WSJ slammed what it called “(t)he deceptive campaign for bivalent (kill shot) boosters,” adding:

The fraudulent HHS “message (is that) updated bivalent (jabs) will improve your protection (sic).”

“This is deceptive advertising.”

“But the public-health establishment’s praise for the bivalent shots shouldn’t come as a surprise.”

“Federal agencies took the unprecedented step of ordering (Pharma profiteers) to produce and recommend them without data supporting their safety or efficacy.”

“(P)roduc(ing) new (jabs) targeting new variants” left unexplained that more scariant than variants are virtually identical — despite fake claims by US/Western regimes claiming otherwise.

The Journal failed to explain that virtually everything claimed about flu/covid jabs and related issues has been fake news.

Or that jabs and boosters were designed to destroy health on the phony pretext of protecting it.

Studies sponsored by Pharms were “designed…to get results they wanted,” no matter how fraudulent.

Yet anti-public health “authorities didn’t raise an eyebrow, but why would they?”

“They have a vested interest in promoting (toxic) bivalents.”

The Pharma-controlled FDA told kill shot producers to rush their toxic bivalent kill shots to market “before clinical data were available,” the Journal reported.

The Pharma-controlled CDC “recommended (toxic) bivalents for all adults without any evidence that they were effective or needed.”

Jab “makers could have performed small randomized trials last summer and early fall that tested the bivalents against the original boosters and a placebo group.” 

“Results could have been available by the end of September.”

“But the public-health authorities didn’t want to wait—and now we know why.”

The Journal’s explanation omitted what’s most crucial to report.

Jabs, boosters and especially bivalent boosters were designed to destroy health while falsely pretending that they protect and preserve it.

Millions of casualties throughout the US/West alone conclusively proved otherwise.

Yet on January 11, Pharma-linked FDA commissioner, Robert Califf, trampled on truth, saying:

Flu/covid jabs “have been associated with a significant reduction in hospitalization and death (sic).”

Reality he ignored is the other way around.

Everyone jabbed was irreparably harmed, the more jabs gotten, the greater the harm to their health.

Unjabbed individuals are profoundly safer.

The Journal falsely claimed that toxic jabs “mitigated severe illness”instead of explaining that they caused it.

Saying “we need honest public-health leaders” ignored that nothing of the sort exists throughout the US/West.

To its credit, the Journal got some things right about the mother of all state-sponsored health-related scams.

But not enough to make a meaningful difference by omitting what’s most crucial to explain.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: